<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Bannerblog News - Latest Comments in Naked Girls Get Interrupted for GH5</title><link>http://bannerblognews.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://bannerblognews.disqus.com/naked_girls_get_interrupted_for_gh5/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 20:01:21 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Naked Girls Get Interrupted for GH5</title><link>http://www.bannerblog.com.au/news/2009/08/naked_girls_get_interrupted_for_gh5.php#comment-15331974</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The french video seemed like a totally original idea, the remake here is almost a blatant rip-off with a nasty twist, ie the fat guy. To be honest they would have more response if they had the five girls.  I wonder at what point does this ad border on rip-off versus inspiration?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DB</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 20:01:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Naked Girls Get Interrupted for GH5</title><link>http://www.bannerblog.com.au/news/2009/08/naked_girls_get_interrupted_for_gh5.php#comment-15116778</link><description>&lt;p&gt;can you ples get girls geting undresed&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 03:52:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Naked Girls Get Interrupted for GH5</title><link>http://www.bannerblog.com.au/news/2009/08/naked_girls_get_interrupted_for_gh5.php#comment-14926916</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i'm sorry, is there a point to these vids? :P i'm in advertising &amp;amp; i don't get it. am i a moron or just missing smthing?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Frehley Fox</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 22:17:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Naked Girls Get Interrupted for GH5</title><link>http://www.bannerblog.com.au/news/2009/08/naked_girls_get_interrupted_for_gh5.php#comment-14638835</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i hate advertising for doing this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Name</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:43:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Naked Girls Get Interrupted for GH5</title><link>http://www.bannerblog.com.au/news/2009/08/naked_girls_get_interrupted_for_gh5.php#comment-13831229</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not sure why they didn't brand it GH5 to begin with?  every blog post Ive seen about it said they are pretty sure it is. I know for certain it is but why try and hide it? Embrace it!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mrtruffle</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 07:12:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Naked Girls Get Interrupted for GH5</title><link>http://www.bannerblog.com.au/news/2009/08/naked_girls_get_interrupted_for_gh5.php#comment-13826231</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like how the drive is to "facebook only". In this case though the reward for going there is very weak (more videos and photos that are less entertaining) and unclear why I should become a fan of this guy - which might explain why there are only 700 fans resulting out of 500,000 views. &lt;br&gt;I assume the justification is that otherwise you wouldn't get picked up by the likes of the LA Times, but a little too “stealth” for my taste.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tim Buesing</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 00:36:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Naked Girls Get Interrupted for GH5</title><link>http://www.bannerblog.com.au/news/2009/08/naked_girls_get_interrupted_for_gh5.php#comment-13775622</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Moinid of the month :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexander Bickov</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 04:03:55 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>